FIELD TESTS
| Successful Projects Using the
Fluid Line Processor 1. Crude Oil: Sulfur content in produced crude oil has become a major problem for refiners. Removing the sulfur requires the implementation of extremely expensive desulfurization units as well as expensive additives to aid in their removal during the refining process. The Fluid Line Processor removes these elements economically and efficiently. The capital costs are less. The operating costs are less due to the reduction of energy requirements to run the processing equipment. Field Trial Results Separation Technologies 2 . CRUDE OIL BS&W AND SULFUR REMOVAL PROJECT Location Westex Oil Reclamation, Notrees, Texas from August 1, 1995 to September 15, 1995. Purpose & Trial Conditions Clean up BS&W and Sulfur in crude oil tank bottoms from Amoco and Anadarko Petroleum delivered to Westex reclamation facility. Daily 6-hour trials runs at 10 bbl/hr for 20 days. Results Tank Bottoms & Oil Field Slops Material Analysis Incoming Processed Reduction BS&W (%) 69.3 0.80 99 Sulfur (%/wt) 2.35 1.05 55 Ferrous Sulfite as FeS(%) 9.14 0.13 98.6 Analysis Reservoirs Inc, Midland, Texas collected independent samples and prepared above analysis (reports available) 3. NO. 6 FUEL OIL (MALAYSIA) Location Ten barrels of No. 6 Fuel Oil from Malaysia were air shipped for processing by CEI at facilities at Midland, Texas from September 15, 1997 to October 3, 1997. Purpose & Trial Conditions Remove Sulfur from No. 6 Fuel Oil. Twice daily runs of 10 minutes over 10 days at a process rate of 5 GPM and 120°F for viscosity reduction. Results Bunker # 6 Fuel Oil Material Analysis Incoming Processed Reduction % Sulfur (%/wt) 3.11 0.48 85 Analysis Maxim Technologies, Inc, Midland, Texas (report available). |
      |
Oil Recovery - Company Profile - Increasing Oil Production - Technology - Sulphur Removal - Additional Applications
Field Tests - Clients Data - Contact Us - Links
DinoTech
Corporation - Oil Recovery Process Leader
Website
Promotions by GetSpecific Internet Marketing